Should I use a traditional monograph or a three-paper dissertation structure for a PhD in Applied Economics?

The choice between a traditional monograph and a three-paper dissertation structure for a PhD in Applied Economics largely depends on the nature of your research, your career goals, and the expectations of your department. Given that your primary research consists of three distinct empirical studies, a cumulative paper structure could be a more effective way to present your findings. This format allows you to showcase your ability to conduct multiple, independent research projects, which is highly valued in the field of Applied Economics. A traditional monograph, on the other hand, can be more challenging to write, especially when your research involves multiple, separate studies. However, if you're able to synthesize your findings and present a cohesive narrative, a monograph can be a powerful tool for demonstrating your expertise in a particular area. It's also worth considering that a monograph can be more suitable for a PhD program that emphasizes theoretical contributions, whereas a cumulative paper structure may be more suitable for a program that emphasizes empirical research. Ultimately, the decision between these two formats should be based on your research goals and the requirements of your department. It's also essential to consider the job market and the types of positions that are available in your field. If you're looking to work in academia, a traditional monograph may be more suitable, whereas a cumulative paper structure may be more competitive for industry positions.