My advisor says keep results concise but the rubric demands detailed academic style—how should I present dissertation results?

You should treat your main text as a guided tour of the data rather than a raw dump, using the tables to carry the heavy lifting of detailed statistical reporting while your narrative focuses strictly on interpreting the key patterns. The rubric’s demand for "detailed academic style" usually refers to the rigor of your methodology and the precision of your language, not the sheer volume of descriptive text. By moving exhaustive coefficient lists, standard errors, and minor variable correlations into well-labeled tables or appendices, you satisfy the requirement for thoroughness without cluttering the reader’s experience. Your advisor wants conciseness because they know that buried insights are often missed; if you describe every single cell in a complex regression table, you dilute the significance of your primary findings. For instance, if you’re analyzing social mobility trends, you might present the full multivariate model in Table 3 but only discuss the three strongest predictors in the paragraph, explaining why those specific variables matter for your theoretical framework. This approach demonstrates that you understand the data deeply enough to curate it, which is a higher-order academic skill than simply transcribing output. Ensure every sentence in your results section actively interprets or contextualizes a finding, rather than just stating what the table shows, as the table itself already states the numbers. This balance respects the rubric’s need for academic precision while honoring your advisor’s push for clarity and impact.