Discussion section rejected twice by strict methods reviewer?

I am a fourth-year biology PhD candidate and my supervisor has now sent back my manuscript's discussion section for the second time, citing that my interpretation of the data overreaches the statistical limits. I have forty-eight hours before the internal review deadline and I am paralyzed by his specific feedback on p-value interpretation. I need a structured checklist to audit whether my claims are actually supported by the results table before I resubmit.