Which literature review template fits a systematic vs narrative approach?

A systematic literature review fits best with a highly structured, tabular matrix template that tracks specific search protocols, inclusion criteria, and study methodologies, whereas a narrative literature review is best served by a thematic or chronological outline template that focuses on synthesizing broader conceptual arguments and historical trends. For a systematic approach, you need a spreadsheet-style extraction form to document every article's sample size, variables, and outcomes to ensure reproducibility. For a narrative approach, a conceptual mind map or a three-part topical outline works best to help you weave a cohesive story across different theoretical perspectives. The single most helpful thing you can do right now is to build a simple three-column synthesis matrix in a basic spreadsheet to organize your sources before you start writing. This tool works wonders because it forces you to categorize your papers by either methodological rigor or thematic contribution, instantly clarifying which path your paper is taking. For instance, if you are writing about classroom technology, a systematic matrix will help you compare the exact sample sizes and software used in ten specific empirical studies, while a narrative outline will let you trace the general evolution of educational tech over the last decade. This simple visual organization will make your final methodology choice obvious to both you and your advisor.