Struggling to connect my data to broader themes in the discussion section without campus library access?

It is completely normal to feel like you are just repeating yourself when you are deep in the weeds of your data, but the trick to bridging that gap is to stop thinking of your discussion as a summary and start treating it like a conversation with your research question. When you find yourself stuck, try the so-what test for every paragraph you have written. If you describe a specific finding, immediately ask yourself why that matters in the context of your original argument. Think of your data like the ingredients in a kitchen; your results section is just listing the groceries you bought, but your discussion is the actual meal you are cooking. You need to explain how those ingredients combine to create the final flavor of your argument. If you are struggling to connect back to broader themes, try pulling out your introduction again and highlighting the main problem you set out to solve. Every single point in your discussion should be a direct response to one of those initial goals. Writing in isolation is incredibly draining, and it is easy to lose perspective when you do not have someone to bounce ideas off of. If you feel like your flow is disjointed, try reading your draft out loud or using a text-to-speech tool to hear how the sentences actually land. Often, we skip over our own logical leaps because we already know what we mean, but hearing it read back can highlight exactly where you need a transition sentence to link your data to a bigger sociological concept. You are doing the hard work of synthesizing complex information on your own, so give yourself some grace if it feels messy right now. Just focus on connecting one finding at a time back to your main thesis, and you will find that the page count fills up naturally as you add that necessary depth. You have already done the heavy lifting of gathering the data, so trust your own voice to tell us what it all really means.