My supervisor keeps revising my methodology draft—how should I organize sources to address feedback efficiently?

The best way to handle this is to stop treating your sources as a giant pile and start using a simple matrix or a spreadsheet to map them directly to your methodology steps. I know how frustrating it feels to have your draft sent back with endless comments, especially when you’re already watching the clock tick down toward your deadline. It’s easy to feel like you’re drowning in PDFs, but think of your methodology like a house you’re building; you wouldn't just throw all your tools into one box and hope for the best. Instead, create a simple table with your methodology sections as the rows and the specific research steps as the columns. As you find a relevant article, drop the citation into the cell that corresponds to the specific step it supports. When you’re searching, try to focus on one section of your design at a time rather than trying to find sources for the whole chapter at once. If you’re stuck on your data collection process, search specifically for that term alongside your topic, and immediately add a one-sentence note in your spreadsheet about why that source works. This way, when your supervisor asks for more recent evidence, you aren't scrolling through dozens of tabs; you’re just looking at your map to see which sections are still thin on support. You’ve clearly put a lot of hard work into this research, and by organizing your sources this way, you’ll be able to turn those revisions around much faster and get back to feeling confident about your submission. You have everything you need to get this finished, so take it one section at a time and you’ll cross that finish line before you know it.