Is 3 days enough for a 1500-word literature review?

Yes, three days is absolutely enough time to write a 1500-word literature review, provided you stop gathering new sources immediately and focus on synthesizing the eight you already have. You have more than sufficient material to meet the "multiple credible sources" requirement, so your primary task now is organization and analysis rather than expansion. The most effective strategy is to build a thematic outline before drafting a single sentence, grouping your sources by argument or concept rather than by author. This prevents the common pitfall of writing a "he said, she said" summary and instead forces you to create a cohesive narrative that supports your specific research question. For instance, if you are studying the impact of social media on adolescent sleep patterns, you might group one source on screen time metrics with another on circadian rhythm disruption, allowing you to draw a direct connection between the two concepts. By mapping these connections first, you can quickly identify which of your eight sources are essential and which are merely supplementary, saving you from the anxiety of wondering if you need to find more material. Since you are using MLA style, take a dedicated hour in the first day to format your in-text citations and bibliography correctly, as this is often where students lose points for minor errors. Do not try to read your sources again from start to finish; instead, rely on your existing notes and highlight the key quotes that support your thematic groups. This approach ensures that every paragraph you write serves a clear purpose in your argument, making the 1500-word limit feel manageable rather than restrictive. By trusting the depth of your current research and prioritizing synthesis over accumulation, you will produce a polished, credible review that satisfies the rubric without burning out.