A senior professor copied my research proposal for a grant. I reported it to my supervisor. Now I’m being pushed out. Has anyone else been through this?
I‘m a research assistant at a prominent university. Last year, I submitted a research proposal to a senior professor as part of my PhD application to his lab. He rejected my application. Several weeks ago, I came across a grant application document he had submitted. The summary section was strikingly similar to my proposal: same research question structure, same key variables, same logical flow, with only minor wording changes. I didn’t confront him directly. Instead, I compiled a comparison document and submitted it to my supervisor — a former dean at the same institution. My supervisor acknowledged it but said “coincidences in research are common.” However, I later learned that he has been quietly submitting request to the external grant department for further investigation, which suggests he took it more seriously than he let on. Meanwhile, the professor in question has: Rejected my PhD application Spread rumours that I‘ve been bad-mouthing him around the department Treated me with visible coldness in professional settings No google scholar records The whole experience has left me feeling drained. I’m still applying to other programmes. I still want to do a PhD. But I keep asking myself: Is it worth continuing in a field where this kind of thing can happen without consequences? I‘m not looking for legal advice. I’m not planning to expose him publicly. I just want to hear from others who have been through something similar. How did you process it? How did you move forward without letting it define your academic identity?
1 Answer
Focus on securing your intellectual property moving forward. When applying to new programs, avoid sharing full proposals or detailed methodologies in initial emails. Instead, provide a high-level abstract and a list of objectives. This protects your core ideas while still demonstrating your competence to potential advisors. Consider shifting your focus toward finding a mentor who prioritizes transparency and ethical mentorship. The current environment may be toxic, but these dynamics are often specific to a particular lab or department rather than the entire academic field. Research the culture of prospective labs by speaking with current graduate students about how their advisors handle credit and collaboration. Document every interaction and communication regarding this dispute. Keep a private log of dates, emails, and specific instances of professional coldness or exclusion. While you may not intend to pursue formal action now, having a factual record is essential if the situation escalates or if you need to explain a gap in your timeline to future committees. Consult your university's ombudsperson. An ombudsperson is typically a neutral party who provides confidential guidance on conflict resolution without triggering a formal administrative process. They can help you navigate the internal politics of the institution and explore options for maintaining your current position while you transition to a different program. Understand that institutional responses to plagiarism vary by jurisdiction and university policy. What one supervisor calls a coincidence, a formal ethics board might view differently. Because university regulations are complex, you may wish to review the student handbook or faculty bylaws to understand the specific definitions of research misconduct at your institution. Continue applying to other programs with a focus on diverse institutions. Expanding your search reduces the influence any single individual has over your career trajectory.
In-depth guide available
Protecting Your Research When Faculty Misappropriate Your Work →Have a similar question?
Ask the community →